Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006: Legal Analysis and Commentaries

Picture of Ben Shaw-Parker, Ph.D.

Ben Shaw-Parker, Ph.D.

What Are The Main Objectives of The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006?

The main objectives of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 are to modernise and update Scottish family law to address the changing dynamics of family structures and relationships in Scotland.

The Family Law (Scotland) Act aims to provide a legal framework that regulates responsibilities and rights between couples, children, and other individuals with an interest in their welfare, while ensuring the protection of the best interests of children regardless of the type of family to which they belong.

The Act seeks to achieve several key objectives, including:

Updating Scottish family law: The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 introduces changes to update Scottish family law to reflect the significant changes in family formation and attitudes towards the family that have occurred in recent decades. It aims to address the legal vulnerabilities experienced by family members in Scotland and ensure that family law protects the best interests of children regardless of the type of family to which they belong.

Regulating divorce: The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 includes provisions that impact the rules regulating divorce, aiming to address the legal aspects of marital dissolution and the associated rights and responsibilities of the parties involved.

Parental responsibilities and rights (PRRs) for fathers: Section 23 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act introduces provisions related to parental responsibilities and rights for fathers, aiming to ensure that fathers have appropriate legal recognition and responsibilities in relation to their children, whether married to the mother or not.

Protection against domestic abuse: Section 24 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act includes measures to provide protection against domestic abuse, recognising the importance of safeguarding individuals from various forms of abuse within family relationships.

Introducing new legal safeguards for cohabiting couples and their children: The Act aims to provide legal safeguards for cohabiting couples and their children, addressing property, succession, and claims in damages for persons living together as if husband and wife or civil partners.

In summary, the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 seeks to modernise and update Scottish family law to address the changing nature of family relationships and provide legal protections and rights for individuals and children within various family structures.

Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 - children's right - divorce in scotland - parental responsibilities scotland - cohabitation scotland
Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006

What Are The Grounds For A Marriage Being Considered Void Under The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006?

Under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006, a marriage can be considered void under specific grounds outlined in the Act.

Section 2 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act introduces statutory grounds that render a marriage void, which were previously only recognised under common law. The grounds for a marriage to be considered void under this Act are as follows:

  • Consent obtained through duress or error: If a party to the marriage was capable of consenting to the marriage but consented only because of duress or error, the marriage shall be void. Duress refers to coercion or threats that lead to the consent to marriage, while error refers to a mistake as to the nature of the marriage ceremony or the identity of the persons involved in the ceremony.
  • Incapacity to understand and consent to marriage: If a party to the marriage was incapable of understanding the nature of marriage and of consenting to the marriage, the marriage shall be void. This refers to situations where a party lacks the mental capacity to comprehend the nature of marriage and to provide valid consent to the marriage – also see section 20 of the Marriage (Scotland) Act 1977.

It is important to note that the Act specifies that a marriage will not be void simply because a party tacitly withheld consent to the marriage at the time the marriage was solemnised, in order to prevent couples who willingly enter into “sham” marriages from relying on the lack of matrimonial consent as a basis for annulment.

What Changes Does The Act Introduce Regarding Occupancy Rights In Matrimonial Homes?

Section 5 and section 6 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 introduces several changes regarding occupancy rights in matrimonial homes, primarily amending the Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981.

These changes aim to address the rights of non-entitled spouses in relation to the matrimonial home and the dealings with third parties.

The key changes introduced by the Act include:

  • Reduction of the qualifying period for occupancy rights: The Act reduces the qualifying period for non-entitled spouses to cease to have occupancy rights in the matrimonial home from five years to two years if there has been no cohabitation between the entitled and non-entitled spouse during that period and the non-entitled spouse has not occupied the home during that time.
  • Limitations on the exercise of occupancy rights: The Act introduces circumstances where the occupancy rights of a non-entitled spouse shall not be exercisable, particularly when a third party has bought the house in good faith from a person who is not the entitled spouse.
  • Court’s power to dispense with consent to dealing with the matrimonial home: The Act amends the circumstances in which courts can dispense with the consent of the non-entitled spouse to the dealing of a matrimonial home, subjecting these circumstances to specific conditions, such as negotiations on the sale of the home not having begun, or the agreed sale price being no less than that specified in the court order dispensing with consent.

These changes aim to provide clarity and protection for both entitled and non-entitled spouses in relation to occupancy rights in matrimonial homes, addressing the complexities that may arise in dealings with third parties and the exercise of occupancy rights.

How Does The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 Amend The Definition Of “Matrimonial Home”?

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 amends the definition of “matrimonial home” as outlined in the Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981.

The amendment under section 9 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 introduces a provision that specifies the circumstances under which a tenancy of a matrimonial home, when transferred from one spouse to the other by agreement or under any enactment, ceases to be regarded as a matrimonial home.

This provision states that if the tenancy of a matrimonial home is transferred from one spouse to the other and, following the transfer, the spouse to whom the tenancy was transferred occupies the home but the other spouse does not, the home shall, on such transfer, cease to be a matrimonial home.

This amendment provides clarity on the circumstances under which a transferred tenancy ceases to be considered a matrimonial home, thereby impacting the rights and obligations associated with the property under the Act.

How Does The Family Law (Scotland) Act Abolish The Status of Illegitimacy?

Section 21 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 removes the status of illegitimacy from Scots Law by amending the Law Reform (Parent and Child) (Scotland) Act 1986, ensuring that no person whose status is governed by Scots law shall be considered illegitimate.

This amendment eliminates the practical effect of illegitimacy for most purposes and abolishes the status itself.

The Act also amends section 1 of the Law Reform (Parent and Child) (Scotland) Act 1986, which deals with legal equality of children, to reflect the abolition of the status of illegitimacy.

The abolition does not apply to the reserved area of hereditary titles and arms, or to the construction of deeds executed and enactments made before the coming into force of the relevant section of the Act.

Overall, the Act takes significant steps to remove the legal concept of illegitimacy from Scots Law, ensuring that no person is considered illegitimate under Scots law.

What Are The Domicile Rules For Persons Under 16 As Established By The Family Law (Scotland) Act?

Section 22 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 outlines the rules for determining the domicile of persons under 16.

These domicile rules for persons under 16, aiming to provide clarity and consistency in determining the domicile of children in Scotland.

They are as follows:

  • Where the parents of a child are domiciled in the same country as each other, and the child has a home with a parent or homes with both of them, the child shall be domiciled in the same country as the child’s parents.
  • If the above rule does not apply, the child shall be domiciled in the country with which the child has, for the time being, the closest connection.

These domicile rules aim to simplify the determination of a child’s domicile by establishing a clear framework based on the domicile of the child’s parents and the closest connection of the child to a specific country.

How Does The Family Law (Scotland) Act Affect Parental Responsibilities And Rights of Unmarried Fathers?

Section 23 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act amends the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 to extend parental responsibilities and rights to unmarried fathers who register the birth of their child jointly with the mother under specific provisions mentioned in the Act.

This amendment ensures that unmarried fathers who register the birth of their child jointly with the mother acquire parental responsibilities and rights, providing them with legal recognition and responsibilities in relation to their children, regardless of their marital status with the mother at the time of conception or subsequently.

However, it is important to note that this amendment does not confer parental responsibilities or rights on a man who was registered under the relevant provisions before the coming into force of the amendment.

Read article: Family Law Act 1996: Legal Analysis, Summary and Frequently Asked Questions

What Measures Does The Family Law (Scotland) Act Introduce For The Protection of Children From Abuse?

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 introduces measures for the protection of children from abuse under Section 24, which amends the Children (Scotland) Act 1995.

This section provides that when the court is considering the welfare of the child in relation to parental responsibilities and rights, the court shall take into account the need to protect the child from any abuse or the risk of any abuse which affects, or might affect, the child.

The definition of abuse includes domestic abuse.

This measure ensures that the welfare of the child is a primary consideration in cases involving parental responsibilities and rights, and it emphasises the importance of protecting children from any form of abuse, including domestic abuse, within the family environment.

In What Circumstances under The Family Law (Scotland) Act Can A Decree Of Divorce Be Postponed Due To Religious Impediments?

A decree of divorce can be postponed due to religious impediments under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 in specific circumstances outlined in Section 15 of the Act.

The Act introduces a new section, 3A, into the Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976, which provides the court with the discretion to postpone the decree of divorce when a religious impediment to remarry exists.

This postponement can occur when irretrievable breakdown of a marriage has been established in an action for divorce, and the court is satisfied that the other party has the ability to remove or contribute to the removal of the impediment preventing the remarriage.

The court may order the other party to produce a certificate from a relevant religious body confirming that the impediment has been addressed.

Additionally, the Scottish Ministers are empowered to make regulations to prescribe the religious faiths which can rely on this provision.

How does The Family Law (Scotland) Act define a cohabitant and what rights do cohabitants have?

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 defines a cohabitant as either a man and a woman living together as if they were husband and wife, or two persons of the same sex living together as if they were civil partners.

The Act outlines the rights of cohabitants in several sections:

  • Rights in certain household goods (Section 26): Cohabitants are presumed to have an equal share in household goods acquired during the period of cohabitation, excluding items received as gifts or acquired by succession from a third party.
  • Rights in certain money and property (Section 27): Money derived from joint household expenses and any property purchased from such money are treated as belonging to each cohabitant in equal shares, except for the family home.
  • Financial provision where cohabitation ends (Section 28): Courts may require one cohabitant to make a limited financial settlement to the other cohabitant, including payment for caring for any child under the age of 16.

These provisions aim to provide legal protection and address financial matters for unmarried cohabitants upon the breakdown of their relationship or in the event of a partner’s death.

What Changes Does The Family Law (Scotland) Act Introduce To The Law On Domestic Interdicts?

Section 26 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 expands the scope of domestic interdicts to provide protection for individuals in cohabiting relationships.

It defines a “domestic interdict” as an interdict granted on the application of a person who is living with another person as if they were husband and wife or civil partners, against the other person for purposes such as restraining or prohibiting certain conduct, or prohibiting the defender from entering or remaining in specific locations, including the family home, other residences, places of work, or schools attended by children in the care of the applicant.

Additionally, the Act specifies that a domestic interdict cannot be used as an alternative to an exclusion order, ensuring that it is not used to exclude an entitled spouse or a spouse with occupancy rights from the matrimonial home unless ancillary to an exclusion order or with court approval.

These changes aim to provide legal safeguards and protection for individuals in cohabiting relationships, addressing the complexities and vulnerabilities experienced in such domestic arrangements.

What Are The Implications Of The Act For Same-Sex Couples?

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006, under section 34, introduces provisions that extend legal protections and rights to same-sex cohabitants, ensuring equality and recognition under the law.

Firstly, the Act defines “cohabitant” to include same-sex couples, providing legal protection and rights to unmarried cohabitants, regardless of their sexual orientation.

This ensures that same-sex cohabitants have rights in relation to household goods, money, and property acquired during the period of cohabitation, as well as financial provision upon the end of the cohabitation, similar to opposite-sex couples.

Additionally, the Act introduces the concept of “domestic interdicts” for unmarried cohabitants, including same-sex couples, providing legal safeguards and protection from abuse within the domestic environment.

This ensures that same-sex cohabitants have access to legal remedies and protections similar to those available to married couples or civil partners.

Furthermore, the Act extends the provisions on occupancy rights to same-sex couples, ensuring that same-sex cohabiting couples have similar rights and protections as opposite-sex couples in relation to the matrimonial home.

Overall, the Act’s implications for same-sex couples are far-reaching, aiming to provide legal recognition, protection, and equality for same-sex cohabitants in Scotland, addressing historical disparities and ensuring that they have access to legal rights and remedies similar to those available to opposite-sex couples.

References

Picture of Ben Shaw-Parker, Ph.D.

Ben Shaw-Parker, Ph.D.

Ben is a university law professor. He has an LLM in Public International Law and a Doctorate in Humanitarian Law. Ben's specialty is in the area of Human Rights, Crime Law, Socio-legal Studies, Common Law, Comparative Law, Public Law and Environmental Law. He has contributed to several law journals.

Table of Contents

Responses

Read Other Articles

Join Thousands of Subscribers Who Read Our Legal Opinions And Case Analysis.